We have updated our Privacy Policy, click here for more information.

Contact

    Thank you

    U.S. Treasury Central Clearing-
    a rule summary

    Published: October 18, 2024

    The drivers:

    The US debt ceiling has been a recurring issue, with Congress frequently pushing it higher to accommodate the nation’s growing financial obligations. This constant adjustment is mirrored by the continuous issuance of US Treasury securities, which has significantly expanded the overall size of the market. As the US Treasury market swells to an impressive $27 trillion, concerns about systemic risks have intensified. The market’s stability is further complicated by a concentration of dealers and greater pressure on broker-dealers to provide necessary liquidity. This combination of factors raises alarms about the potential vulnerabilities within this crucial financial system.

    The SEC answer:

    In response to these growing concerns, the SEC has implemented two key regulations aimed at enhancing market stability and oversight.

    The overarching objective of these SEC rules is to reduce systemic risk and increase operational efficiency, thereby fortifying the financial infrastructure and addressing the vulnerabilities within the US Treasury market:

    • Standardise and streamline trading activities by using a central counterparty (CCP) to facilitate transactions, reducing the potential for errors
    • Create a buffer against losses, as central clearing necessitates the posting of margin
    • Enhance liquidity and improve market efficiency

    Furthermore, the adoption of central clearing provides market participants with access to a broader range of counterparties, which can lead to tighter bid-ask spreads and lower transaction costs.

    Compliance Timeline

    Rule summary:

    (Click for more information)

    SEC Rule 17ad-22

    SEC Rule 17ad-22 requires clearing agencies to adopt comprehensive risk management practices, ensuring the efficient clearance and settlement of transactions:

    Each CCA needs to have written policies and procedures requiring direct participants to submit for clearance and settlement all eligible secondary market transactions to which it is counterparty. This applies to Cash, Repo and reverse repo.

    Expanded Scope of Centrally Cleared Trades for Covered Clearing Agencies

    SEC Rule 15c3-3a

    SEC Rule 15c3-3a, known as the Customer Protection Rule, mandates that brokerage firms safeguard customer assets by maintaining a reserve of funds and securities. The 3a rule stipulates the need to segregate the client/agent accounts and margin and to give access to client to post directly into CCP.

    Margin Management

    Increased Facilitation measures for indirect clearing

    Who will be impacted?

    Banks and Broker-Dealers: when involved in trading U.S. Treasury securities, they will need to adjust their processes to comply with the central clearing requirement. They may need to establish relationships with central counterparties (CCPs), renegotiate bilateral client agreements, and adapt their trading infrastructure to the changes.

    Institutional investors, hedge funds, asset managers, and other buy side market participants trading U.S. Treasury securities: will need to familiarise themselves with the new central clearing requirements and adjust their trading strategies and operations accordingly.

    Clearing houses: Central counterparties (CCPs) responsible for central clearing will see increased activity as more U.S. Treasury transactions are cleared through their platforms. They will need to ensure that their systems can handle the additional volume and manage associated risks effectively.

    Scope of Eligible Secondary Market Transactions:

    The rule has no geographical boundaries; it will apply cross border to all entities dealing in US Treasuries, repo and reverse repos.

    • Repos and Reverse Repos where one of the counterparties is a direct participant of clearing agencies will need to cleared ; this evidently include bilateral and triparty operations.
    • Purchases and sales entered by a member of the clearing agency acting as an interdealer broker
    • Purchases and sales entered by a member of the clearing agency and a broker-dealer, government securities broker, or a government securities dealer

    Exclusions to the scope:

    Any transaction that does not involve a direct participant – between indirect participants only

    Any Transaction between a direct participant and a hedge fund or leveraged account.

    For Cash market : Transaction with a central bank, sovereign entity, a Supranational (ex EBRD) and a natural person

    For Repo :

    any transaction with another central counterparty (CME FICC) , a state or local government (this do not apply to pension plans)

    Inter-affiliate Transactions are subject to finer rule requiring all transaction to be cleared in order to benefit from the exclusion

    What are the access models proposed by the FICC

    (currently the only CCP eligible to clear these transactions):

    (Click for more information)

    Direct Participation

    This model allows firms to become direct members of the FICC, giving them full access to its clearing and settlement services. This is typically used by larger financial institutions.

    Indirect Participation

    • Sponsored Service: a sponsoring member (usually a bank or broker-dealer) sponsors other firms, allowing them to access FICC’s services indirectly.
    • Agent Client model ( mirrors the FCM clearing model) : Clearing on behalf of Non-CCP Members.

    Key Challenges for Market Participants

    FICC currently being the only Clearing agency able to clear such transactions, challenges should be assessed for all market players:

    FICC members

    • Assess and validate their capacity to clear the relevant transactions.
    • Scope and confirm framework for eligible market transactions.
    • Be prepared, identify which clearing model to offer clients.
    • Set up the legal, documentation and procedural frameworks to be able to do so.
    • Adapt to new systems, operations and documentation created by the FICC to accommodate the increased volume of transactions, compliance programs and margin segregation rules.

    Non FICC members

    • Assess and evaluate the different access models’ impact on the firm’s balance sheet.
    • Establish and/or maintain the ability to trade with multiple direct participants through negotiation of contractual relationships ( documentation, done-with vs done-away..).
    • Assess the operational impact of the chosen access model.
    • Assess the economical impact on capital and cost of margining.

    Preparing for Central Clearing, a summary of required assessments:

    (Click for more information)

    • Market participants will need to review transactions to determine all eligible trades.
    • Direct members of the FICC can clear their own transactions
    • Nonmembers will need to establish agreements with direct members in order to access central clearing indirectly through one of FICC’s client clearing models.
    • Make sure all customer activity can be separated in an omnibus account
    • Update the processes and formula for margin management
    • The FICC collects margin from members to prevent market risk triggered by a default, so market participants will need to consider the impact of central clearing upon their margining and collateral management processes.
    • Non-FICC members will need to create a margin calculation process with their sponsors, repaper impacted client agreements, and examine the effectiveness of their overall collateral management processes
    • A structured change management process will be paramount to effectively implement the changes required by the final rule.
    • Institutions will require updates to systems and procedures in response to systemic and operational changes made to accommodate the rule.
    • What controls should be put in place to reduce operational risk induces by the updated processes.
    • Legal documentation for client agreements will be a priority, given the typically long lead time required to repaper.
    • Industry-wide efforts to develop standard documentation around the rule is anticipated.

    Curious to know more?
    First Derivative is available to help

    The positive outcomes induced by the implementation of the new rule would reduce operational and market risks. These rules having no geographical boundaries, firms should assess their exposure to UST and Repos holistically, including balance sheet impacts of each decision.

    First Derivative is eager to help you navigate through the Central Clearing journey and provide the support and expertise to comprehend the complexities and challenges that the implementation will require.

    (Click on the icons to find out more)

    Our Services

    Regulatory Complexity / Scale

    System Integration and Required Changes

    Risk Management

    Data Quality

    Client Outreach

    Capacity Constraints

    Regulatory Complexity / Scale

    With the rule change impacting various entities, systems and departments, a thorough PM/PMO structure with proven governance and control models would be required.

    Our team comprises a diverse pool of experts, including seasoned Technical Experts, deep-dive Business Process and Functional specialists, experienced Project Managers, and dedicated Support professionals. This unique blend of talent enables us to deliver comprehensive solutions that address the multifaceted challenges faced by financial institutions. By combining technical proficiency with in-depth business understanding, we ensure successful project execution and ongoing support.

    Contact us today

    Elias Ghanem

    Elias Ghanem
    Senior Leadership Team, First Derivative
    First Derivative LinkedIn profile

    Barry McAleer

    Barry McAleer
    Practice Lead | Regulatory Solutions NAM
    First Derivative LinkedIn profile


    Meet the First Derivative Transaction Reporting Team

    Explore

    More Insights

    Your rate of change

    Starts here